Cloj posted a comment in response to my post George Calloway must die, which I’d like to respond to.
Firstly, yes, this site does seriously lack seriousness. This is intentional, and is called having a sense of humour. I’m not a political commentator, and this is not a political blog, but I do have opinions which I express on this blog occasionally.
Secondly, I don’t actually think the ad hominem criticism applies here, because I think that public leaders ought to be held to a higher standard in their personal lives. Making criticisms of someone’s character is a valid thing to do when it comes to leaders. If he were a philosopher or scientist putting forward theories, ad hominem wouldn’t be such a problem, but he’s not, he’s a member of parliament.
I see that you’re using the ad hominem fallacy when you say I’m just “scratching [my] ass for comments”, and again where you propose that I am just following what the media tells me is the correct opinion. It would be easy for me to interpret your arguments as arising from your insecurity.
Thirdly, you’re right in saying that I am not an expert in Galloway’s policies or political practice (I misspelled his surname, for crying out loud). I can’t vouch for his political activity but you’ll notice that I wasn’t criticising that.
I said that his appearance on Big Brother detracted from his credibility. I don’t expect to see elected representatives wearing pink leotards or pretending to be a cat. That has lowered his dignity, and it makes a mockery out of British politics, the people who voted for him, as well as those who didn’t.